Agrawal, T. J. (1998). Dynamic Interaction of Bank Risk Exposures : An Empirical Study for the Indian Banking Industry. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277975218767543
Al-shubiri, F. N. (2013). ANALYSIS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LIQUIDITY , CREDIT RISK AND MARKET VALUE IN COMMERCIAL JORDANIAN BANKING, 5(5), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.7813/2075-4124.2013/5-5/B.16
Bawa, N. (2017). Comparative Performance Analysis of Nationalized Banks : A CAMEL Model Analysis. The IUP Journal of Bank Management,XVI(4), 34-49.
CHITAKOGLU, & ERDAK. (2017). Liquidity & Credit Risk and Their Effects on the Risk of Financial Distress : Evidence from Banking System in Iran. International Journal of Economic Perspectives,11(2), 968-976.
Gupta, C. A. R. (2014). An Analysis of Indian Public Sector Banks Using Camel Approach, 16(1), 94–102.
Imbierowicz, B., & Rauch, C. (2014). The relationship between liquidity risk and credit risk in banks, 40, 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.11.030
Kaur, P. (2015). A Financial Performance Analysis of the Indian Banking Sector Using CAMEL Model. The IUP Journal of Bank Management,XIV, 19-33.
Khatik, S. K. (2015). Performance measurement system in indian banking sector in camel framework, 16(1), 75–86.
Nikomaram, H., Taghavi, M., & Diman, S. K. (2013). The relationship between liquidity risk and credit risk in Islamic banking industry of Iran. Management Science Letters, 3, 1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2013.02.025
Nu, S., Htay, N., & Salman, S. A. (2013). Quantitative Analysis on the Correlation between Risks : Empirical Evidence from Banks in United Kingdom, IOSR Journal of Business and Management 9(5), 51–58.
Nu, S., Htay, N., & Salman, S. A. (2014). Is There Any Relationship among the Risks of Banks in Malaysia ?, 30, 295–301. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.30.icmrp.38
Priya, B. D., & Manjula, C. (2016). FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF IDBI USING CAMEL MODEL, 6(2), 97–106.
Reddy, N. (2016). PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF INDIAN BANKING, 14(10), 6835–6844.
Sayed, G. J. (2013). Comparative Analysis of Four Private Sector Banks as per CAMEL Rating, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/2278533720130204