International Research journal of Management Science and Technology

  ISSN 2250 - 1959 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9367 (Print) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMST

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 216    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT CHEMICALS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CHICKPEA RUST

    3 Author(s):  DR .LOKESH B.K. , DR .GURUPRASAD BALLOL, DR.BASAMMA

Vol -  9, Issue- 8 ,         Page(s) : 91 - 97  (2018 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMST

Abstract

Fungal diseases are major constraints to chickpea production in the developing countries. Among various diseases, the rust caused by (Uromyces ciceris-arietini ) (Grogon) Jacz. & Boyer is considered as one of the most distructive disease of chickpea. Rust pathogen affects in all growth stages results in substantial losses in terms of both quality and quantity parameters of grain and this reinforces the need to exploit several management strategies including chemical control. Therefore, present investigation was carried out to examine the efficacy of total of twelve chemicals fungicides alone and/or in combination against rust disease of chickpea in two independent locations viz., Arabhavi and Dharwad during 2017-18. The field experiment consisting of three replication and thirteen treatments. The results of the experiment revealed that all the twelve fungicides tested were found effective for the management of chickpea rust disease as compare to control (water spray). However spray combination of Tebuconazole 50 % + Trifloxystrobin 25% w/w 75 WG @ 1.0 g /l twice at onset of disease significantly reduced rust incidence with record of 14.28 PDI with high total yield of 12.36 qtl/ha followed by Tebuconazole 25 EC @1 ml/l recorded 15.72 PDI with yield of 12.22qtl/ha, Propioconazole 25EC @1.0 ml/lit (Tilt) recorded 16.41 PDI with higher yield of 11.17 qtl/ha) found effective in reducing the disease. While, Difenconazole 25 EC@1 ml/l showed 17.45 PDI and yield of 10.56qtl/ha, Tebuconazole 50 % + Trifloxystrobin 25% w/w 75WG @ 0.5 g/l recorded 18.25 PDI and 10.36qtl/ha of yield and Pyraclostrobin 25 EC @1 ml/l observed with 20.02 rust PDI with yield of 10.32qtl/ha showing equally effective in reducing rust percent disease incidence and increased yield when compared to control that recorded highest rust disease incidence (53.71 PDI) and lower yield (6.16 qtl/ha).

1. Ashwani KB, Daisy B, Pankaj M, Sharma BK (2013) Fungicidal management of rust, powdery mildew and ascochyta blight in seed crop of pea. Pl Dis Res 28 : 22—28
2. Basandrai AK, Basandrai D, Mittal P, Sharma BK. Fungicidal management of rust, powdery mildew and Ascochyta blight in seed crop of pea, Pl. Dis. Res. 2013; 28:22-28.
3.  Emeran AA, Sillero JC, Fernández-Aparicio M, Rubiales D. Chemical control of faba bean rust (Uromyces viciae-fabae). Crop Prot. 2011; 30:907-912.
4. Hemachandra L (2000) Prediction model for lentil rust and its integrated management. PhD thesis. Rajendra Agric Univ, Bihar, India.
5. Huge HI, Nahar MS. Efficacy and economics of different fungicides in controlling rust and powdery mildew of garden pea, Bangladesh. J Sci. Indust. Res. 1997; 32(4):533-536.
6. Jones, D.R. (1983) Chickpea rust – a disease new to Australia. Queensland Department of Primary Industry Farm Note AGDEX 168/673.
7. Khedekar SA (2012) Studies on soybean rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi Syd.) and chickpea rust (Uromyces ciceris-arietini (Grognot) Jacz. and Boy). PhD thesis. Univ Agric Sci, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
8. Kuck KH, Scheinpflug H, Pontzen R. DMI fungicides. In: Lyr, H. (Ed.), Modern Selective Fungicides: Properties, Applications, Mechanisms of Action, second ed. Gustav Fischer Verlag, New York, 1995, 205-258.
9. Mayee CD, Datar VV. Phytopathometry. Technical Bulletin-1 (Special Bulletin 3), Marathwada Agric. Univ. Parbhani. 1986; 218.
10. Nene YL, Reddy MV, Haware MP, Ghanekar AM, Amin KS, Pande S and Sharma M. 2012. Field Diagnosis of Chickpea Diseases and their Control. Information Bulletin No. 28 revised).Patancheru, A.P. 502 324, India: International Crops Research, Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 60 pp.
11.  Pandey R.N., N.M. Gohel and Pratik Jaisani. 2017. Management of Wilt and Root Rot of Chickpea caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri and Macrophomina phaseolina through Seed Biopriming and Soil Application of Bio-Agents. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 6(5): 2516-2522.
12.  Ragazzi, 1982, Pulse Research Laboratory, Division of Genetics, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India. E-mail: hasan_ra@rediffmail. com
13. Rubiales, D., Pérez-de-Luque, A., FernándezAparicio, M., Sillero, J.C., Román, B., Kharrat, M., Khalil, S., Joel, D.M. and Riches, C.H. (2006) Screening techniques and sources of resistance against parasitic weeds in grain legumes. Euphytica 147, 187–199.
14. Scherm H, Christiano RSC, Esker PD, Del Ponte EM, Godoy CV. Quantitative review of fungicide efficacy trials for managing soybean rust in Brazil. Crop Prot. 2009; 28:774-782.
15. Sillero JC, Fondevilla S, Davidson J, Vaz Patto MC, Warkentin TD, Thomas J, Rubiales D. Screening techniques and sources of resistance to rusts and mildews in grain legumes. Euphytica. 2006; 147:255-272.
16. Singh, N. P., 2011, Project Co-coordinator Report, 2010-11. All India Coordinated  Research Project, Kanpur-208024.
17. Sugha SK, Banyal DK, Rana SK. Management of pea (Pisum sativum) rust (Uromyces fabae) with fungicides. Indian J Agr. Sci. 2008; 78:269-271
18. Sunilkumar Shirasangi, Basavarajappa M. P., Nargund V. B. In vivo Evaluation of Fungicides against Chickpea Rust Caused by [Uromyces ciceris-arietini (Grognot) Jacz. and Boy], Environment & Ecology 35 (4E) : 3809—3812, October—December 2017.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details