International Research journal of Management Science and Technology

  ISSN 2250 - 1959 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9367 (Print) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMST

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 814    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

GENERATION-Y PERCEPTION TOWARDS SCALED DOWN AND SURROGATE ADVERTISING: ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES

    2 Author(s):  HARINADH KARIMIKONDA, SUNEELSANKALA

Vol -  9, Issue- 2 ,         Page(s) : 152 - 162  (2018 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMST

Abstract

Surrogate advertising, is a way to get around the ban on direct advertising of alcohol and cigarette products was in turn banned by the government which led brands find newer, more innovative ways to promote their products and make them visible to the aam junta, because, yes, obviously they do have to reach out to the masses since they have a product to sell. Surrogate publicizing is a structure of promoting which may be used to advertise items even though There is a ban on Tobacco products advertisements namely Cigarettes, Pan Masala, Chewed Tobacco, Gutka and beedi directly or indirectly. The present study identified with the objectives based on demographical variables (Gender , Income, Occupation) especially on Generation – Y perceptual gap between scale down and surrogate advertising of alcoholic beverages. The findings of the present research is Gender and Income has effect on the perception but occupation does not have effect on the scaled down and surrogate advertisements and moreover Generation – Y does not have perceptual effect on scaled down and surrogate advertisements.

1. Seema A.Suryawanshi (2013), The study of advertising with an Indian perspective, Indian journal of applied research,3,1.
2. Dr. S.G.Khawaspatil, laximikant s. Hurne(2011), A successful marketing strategy for liquor, whisky products, Indian stream research journal,1,2230-7850.
3. Pushpindersingh(2015), Surrogate advertising & its impsct on the mind, Indian journal of research,3,20-25.
4. Chandekharsingh(2015), Evolution of surrogate advertising and its legal measures with special reference to India, school of management sciences,ix,0973-936x.
5. Dhrity Ahuja, Surrogate Advertisement(2015) : The Marketers Tool,DAV institute of management,15,548-553.
6. V.V.Devi Prasad Kotni(2011), The Banned Surrogate Marketing As Brand-New Brand ExtentionAdvertising,Indian journal of management,2,50-55.
7. Eitan Gerstner, James Hess, Wujin(1992) Demarketing as a Differentiation Strategy,solan school of management,3,49-57.
8. Edward Shiu, Louise M Hassan, GainfracoWalsh(2007), Demarketing tobacco through governmental policies-The up’s revisited,journal of business research,4,1-
9. Varalakshmi.T(2013), An emphirical study on surrogate advertising: A Pioneering Trend,Indian journals,5,60-65.
10. Monika Bangari(2016), Research Scholar, Advertising Ethics & Surrogate Advertising Practices,school of management,3,70-75.
11. Yugank Goyal(2009), Surrogate Advertising in india,cuts international,3,1-5
12. Ms. Kirti Singh Dahiya, Ms. Kirtimiglani(2013), Emergence of Surrogate Advertisments,Indian journals of management,4,50-55.
13. Hemant Chauhan, PalkiSetia(2016), Discouraging eigarette Smoking through de-marketing Strategies,Indian journal of management,4,45-49.
14. UmeshRaut& Dr. PrafullaPawar(2010), An Analysis of perception of Tobacco Consumers towords the De-Marketing of Tobacco Products,business school of management,4,25-30.
15. Mahmood jaismAlsamydai(2015), The impact of ostensible Demarketing strategy on improving product reputation in customer minds,international business of management and business research,4,973-978.
16. Gnepa, TahiJ(2007), Consumer awareness & Successful demarketing of public goods: a study of residential water conservation behavior,Indian journal of management,3,100-110.
17. MsDeepanathwari(2016), Impact of Surrogate Advertising,Journal for Contemporary Research in Management,4,42-52.
18. Jeanine Miklos-Thal(2011); Juanjuanzhang, Strategic Demarketing,MITsolan school of management,4,1-33.
19. Dr. Shweta choudary(2014), Surrogate Advertising: Hard products Promoted Softly,International research reffered journal,2,1-4.
20. Prof Manjunanth.G, Mr. SreekanthP.K(2015), Surrogate advertising: the awareness & Does it helps to promote core products itself in India context,international journal of business quantitative and economics research,2,41-54.
21. Barcelona Pandex(2009), Surrogate Advertisements: Indias Response Towords International Regulations,Indian journal of management,70-75.
22. By SachitPaliwal(2012), Surrogate Marketing-a new extension in Advertising,business school of management,4,50-55.
23. Shashank vihari(2015), Bianca Mascarehas, Aakash Sharman, Prof Sridharan, The Legal Aspects of Surrogate Advertising,International Journal of Business and Administration Research Review,3,228-229.
24. ManasChakrabarti(2015), Ethical issue of surrogate Advertisements in India Advertising Scenario: An Empirical Study,Indian journals,4,637-42.
25. SollyMatshonsiaseeleste(2016), Demarketing Strategy to develop perceived product reputation: Applications in three distinct environment,hardward business review,72-
26. Philip Kotler & Sidney J.Levy(1971), Demarketing, yes, demarketing,journal of business ethics,4,405-416.
27. Michelle inness, Julian barling, keith rogers, nick turner(2007), De-marketing Tobacco price changes & Consumer Attemptc Quit Smoking,journal of business ethics,3,150-140.
28. Amir Grinstein &udinisan(2009), Demarketing, minorities, and national attachment,journal of marketing,73,105-172.
29. Sushma C, SharangC(2005), Pan Massala advertisements are Surrogate for tobacco,Indian journal of cancer,72,94-98.
30. Ashish mishra, mrinalinipandey(2014), Ethics of wine marketing in India, International Journal of Business and Management Invention,3,48-51.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details