International Research journal of Management Science and Technology

  ISSN 2250 - 1959 (online) ISSN 2348 - 9367 (Print) New DOI : 10.32804/IRJMST

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 75    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

A STUDY ON IMPACT OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY ON EDUCATION: AN ELECTRONIC LEARNING

    1 Author(s):  DR. HENA IQBAL

Vol -  8, Issue- 3 ,         Page(s) : 10 - 14  (2017 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMST

Abstract

Web-based instruction, also called e-learning, is currently one of the most talked about education and training media. To prepare courses for online delivery and to maintain their effectiveness, the designer must have an understanding of e-learning instructional design principles. Action learning is a proven, effective management development process that has not been implemented to date as an e-learning instructional methodology. The purpose of this exploratory case study was to examine the impact of the action learning process on the effectiveness of management level web-based instruction (WBI). A leader-led, management-level course using face-to-face delivery was converted to web-based instruction where action learning was the delivery methodology. It was found that, though challenging to facilitate, the action learning online method is effective and yields changes in participants’ knowledge.

  1. Arbaugh, J. B. (2000) An exploratory study of the effects of gender on student learning and class participation in an internet-based MBA course, Management Learning, 31, pp. 533 - 49.
  2. Arbaugh, J. B. and Duray, R. (2002) Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based courses: an exploratory study of two on-line MBA programs, Management Learning, 33, pp. 331 - 48.
  3. Bannan-Ritland, B. (2001) An action learning framework for teaching instructional design, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 14(2), pp. 37 - 51. 
  4. Cho, S. and Berge, Z. (2002) Overcoming barriers to distance training and education, Education at a Distance, The USDLA Journal, 16(1), pp. 1 - 15.
  5. Clark, L. J. (2001) Web-based teaching: a new educational paradigm, Intercom, 48, pp. 20 - 3.
  6. Creswell, J. (1998) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
  7. Dilworth, R. L. (1998a) Action learning in a nutshell, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 11(1), pp. 28 - 43.
  8. Dilworth, R. L. (1998b) Setting the stage. Special Issue of Performance Improvement Quarterly, 11(1), pp. 5 - 8.
  9. Dilworth, R. and Willis, V. (2003) Action Learning: Images and Pathways (Malabar, FL: Krieger).
  10. Dixon, N. M. (1998a) Building global capacity with global task teams, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 11(1), pp. 108 - 12.
  11. Dixon, N. M. (1998b) Action learning: more than just a task force, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 11(1), pp. 44 - 58.
  12. Dolmans, D., Gijselaers, W. H., Moust, J. and Grave, W. (2002) Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: conclusions and implications for educational practice and research, Medical Teacher, 24(2), pp. 173ff.
  13. Downey, S., Wentling, R. M., Wentling, T. and Wadsworth, A. (2005) The relationship between national culture and the usability of an e-learning system, Human Resource Development International, 8(1), pp. 47 - 64. Driscoll, M. (1999) Web-based training in the workplace, Adult Learning, 10(4), pp. 21 - 5.
  14. Duffy, T. and Jonassen, D. (Eds) (1992) Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum).
  15. Forman, D. C. (2002) Benefits, costs, and the value of e-learning programs, in: A. Rossett (Ed.) The ASTD E-Learning Handbook: Best Practices, Strategies, and Case Studies for an Emerging Field, pp. 398 - 413 (New York: McGraw- Hill).

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details