ADVERTISING - TWO MENTAL PROCESSES IN DECISION-MAKING
1
Author(s):
BHAVLEEN KAUR
Vol - 1 , Issue- 3 ,
Page(s) : 38 - 48
(2010 )
DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/IRJMST
Abstract
There are two fundamentally different mental processes at work in choice decisions. We have already considered the most obvious one, the weighing up of alternatives. But there is another process that consumers and advertisers tend to be less conscious of. Weighing up the alternatives is one thing. Which alternatives get weighed up is another
- M. Sutherland & J. Galloway, ‘The implications of agenda setting for advertising research’, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 21, No. 5, 1981, pp. 25–9.
- Food Marketing Institute as reported in Businessweek, 7 January 1996.
- Andrew Ehrenberg, Neil Barnard & John Scriven, ‘Differentiation or salience, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 37, No. 6, NovemberDecember 1997, pp. 7–14.
- [15]J.A. Bargh, ‘Losing consciousness: Automatic influences on consumer judgment, behavior, and motivation’, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 29, No. 2, September 2002, pp. 280–5.
- [16]M. Sutherland & S. Holden, ‘Slipstream marketing’, Journal of Brand Management, June 1997.
- [17]R. Fazio, P. Herr & M. Powell, ‘On the development and strength of category-brand associations in memory: The case of mystery ads’, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1992, Vol. I (1), pp. 1–13.
- [19]P. Dickson & A. Sawyer, ‘The price knowledge and search of supermarket shoppers’, Journal of Marketing, July 1990, pp. 42–53.
- [20]W. Wells & L. Losciuto, ‘Direct observation of purchasing behaviour’, Journal of Marketing Research, August 1966, p. 227. M. Sutherland & T. Davies, ‘Supermarket shopping behavior: An observational study’, Caulfield Institute of Technology Psychology and Marketing Series, No. 1, August 1978.
- [21]P. Winkielman, N. Schwarz, R. Reber & T.A. Fazendeiro, ‘Affective and cognitive consequences of visual fluency: When seeing is easy on the mind’, in Visual Persuasion (ed. R. Batra), Ann-Arbor, Michigan, 2000.
|